New Energy Projects
Offshore wind energy and transnational grids bring power lines below the waves.
Photograph by Carsten Rehder, dpa/Corbis
Submarine power cables have been around since the
early 1800s. But for most of their history, such cables were used
primarily to transmit electricity from conventional sources such as coal
plants, either between countries or out to islands or oil platforms.
As recently as a decade ago, the submarine cable industry
was in decline. That changed in the mid-2000s, as rising energy prices
and concerns about climate change stimulated interest in developing
offshore wind and more efficient transnational power grids.
The worldwide market for submarine electrical cables has
surged over the past decade, according to industry observers, and is set
to grow even more. A report
published in November 2013 by Navigant Research, a Boulder,
Colorado-based firm that tracks the energy industry, predicts that
global sales of high-voltage submarine power cables will nearly triple
over the next decade, from $1.9 billion in 2014 to more than $5.3
billion in 2023.
Bringing the Sea's Wind Energy to Shore
"I can tell you that there is a demand for submarine cables," said Walt Musial, principal engineer for the National Wind Technology Center,
a program of the U.S. Department of Energy. "Offshore wind
installations are growing in number—you're seeing development in the
North Sea and the Asian markets, and there's a strong possibility the
market will develop in the U.S. as well."
Per-Arne Osborg, a Norway-based research and development manager at cable-maker Nexans,
also predicts continued growth, particularly in high voltage DC (HVDC)
submarine lines that can transmit electricity for long distances with
fewer losses than alternating current, or AC, lines. "Yes definitively,
the renewable power has to be distributed and a grid capable of
transporting the power will be needed," Osborg said in an email. (See
related: "High Voltage DC Breakthrough Could Boost Renewable Energy.")
The $340 million submarine transmission cable being built for DanTysk,
the wind farm in the German North Sea, will stretch nearly 99 miles
(159 kilometers). The company building the line, Italian-based cable-maker Prysmian Group, also is a player in Western Link,
an ambitious plan to link Scottish and English power grids with a $1.1
billion, 239-mile (385-kilometer) submarine cable under the Irish Sea.
And Canada is moving ahead with construction of a $1.5 billion line that would allow Nova Scotia to import hydroelectric power from Labrador.
Photograph by Carsten Rehder, dpa/Corbis
Forging such underwater connections will help nations use
electricity more efficiently and take advantage of distant renewable
sources, while also preserving green space on land, said Julian Pease, a
U.S.-based Prysmian business manager for submarine cables.
"Scotland has more offshore wind farms to build, and that
power is needed in the south of England," he said. "It would have been
difficult to get government permits for the traditional method of using
overhead lines, because it would have cut across a lot of picturesque
countryside. This is an alternative solution, which reduces the
environmental impact."
Pease said that wind power provides about 60 percent of the
market for cables. In addition to long lines to shore, a wind farm with
200 turbines also might require as much as 125 miles (200 kilometers)
of cable to link them all together.
Costs and Unknowns
Burying cables about 6.5 feet (2 meters) under the ocean
floor, which involves the use of specially designed ships and robotic
vehicles, does have some environmental impacts, according to a 2009 report
by the Convention for the Protection of the Marine Environment of the
North-East Atlantic. Cables can provide artificial habitats that attract
animals and plants not normally found in an area, "but such change is
not likely to be significant," the report said. But because of a lack of
research, not as much is known about what, if any, effect of
electromagnetic fields and heat generated by the cables might have on
aquatic life, the report noted.
But proponents of submarine cables argue that improving
energy efficiency on land and reducing emissions of greenhouse gases
will tip the scale positively in the long run. One salient example is
the 360-mile (580-kilometer) Nor Ned
submarine cable, which allows Dutch consumers to draw on hydro power
generated in Norway during daytime peak demand period, while Norwegians
can draw power from Dutch coal-burning power plants when they need it.
The increased efficiency produced by the linkage reduces carbon dioxide
emissions by nearly 1.7 million tons per year, according to cable maker ABB.
Nor Ned, which was completed in 2008, currently is the
world's longest submarine power cable. But far bigger projects have been
proposed. Perhaps the most ambitious is the 621-mile (1,000-kilometer) submarine cable
that Iceland's state-owned electricity firm Landsvirkjun has proposed
building to Great Britain, which would supply some of the island's
abundant geothermal, hydro and wind energy to British consumers. British
financier Edi Truell is exploring how to raise more than $6 billion needed to build the line, whose feasibility is still being studied.
In the United States, Google and other sponsors want to
connect the mid-Atlantic region with a high-voltage submarine cable that
would bring offshore wind power to New Jersey and other states in the
region. But that offshore wind capacity doesn't exist yet: Projects such
as the Atlantic City wind farm proposed by Fisherman's Energy have
suffered regulatory and other delays, and the website for the Atlantic Wind Connection lists the cable's completion date as "TBD."
Google was willing to invest in the $5 billion Atlantic line, it said,
because it made "good business sense" and because otherwise, each wind
farm project would need to build its own transmission lines, causing
delays and grid inefficiencies.
0 comments:
Post a Comment